If fuel cost matters most
Toyota RAV4 with up to 40 MPG combined.
12 makes · 49 models · 236 powertrains indexed
Data: NHTSA · EPA · Manufacturer records
100% free
Side-by-side verified model comparison
Toyota RAV4 and Ford Explorer answer the same shopping question from different directions. The RAV4 is more efficient on verified EPA data, while the Explorer reaches the higher power peak. Use the table below to decide whether your priority is fuel cost, safety, size or outright output.
| Metric | Toyota RAV4 | Ford Explorer |
|---|---|---|
| Production coverage | 1994 - present | 1990 - present |
| Verified generations | 2 | 2 |
| Peak power | 302 hp | 400 hp |
| Best EPA combined | 40 MPG | 25 MPG |
| Latest NHTSA overall | 5★ | NR |
| Open recalls (2019/2020) | 7 | 33 |
| Latest dimensions | 4600 × 1855 × 1685 mm | 5049 × 2004 × 1775 mm |
| Average curb weight | 1765 kg (3891 lbs) | 2117 kg (4667 lbs) |
| Fuel types | Petrol, Hybrid, Plug-in Hybrid | Petrol, Hybrid |
If fuel cost matters most
Toyota RAV4 with up to 40 MPG combined.
If power matters most
Ford Explorer with a verified peak of 400 hp.
If safety is the filter
The available data is incomplete, so use the side-by-side table rather than a one-line verdict.
A detailed side-by-side comparison of the entry-level powertrain for the newest verified generation of each model. This shows exactly what you get before adding options or stepping up to premium trims.
| Specification | Toyota RAV4RAV4 XA50 2.5 Dynamic Force AWD | Ford ExplorerExplorer VI (U625) 2.3L EcoBoost AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Engine & Performance | ||
| Engine Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Cylinders / Configuration | I4 | I4 |
| Displacement | 2.5L (2487 cc) | 2.3L (2261 cc) |
| Aspiration | Naturally aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Horsepower | 203 hp | 300 hp |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 420 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | 8.5 s | 6.0 s |
| Top Speed | 190 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Transmission & Drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | Automatic | 10-Speed Automatic |
| Gears | 8 | — |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| Fuel Economy & Range | ||
| City MPG (EPA) | 25.0 MPG | 20.0 MPG |
| Highway MPG (EPA) | 33.0 MPG | 27.0 MPG |
| Combined MPG (EPA) | 28.0 MPG | 23.0 MPG |
| Electric Range | — | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | — |
| CO₂ Emissions | 188 g/km | — |
| Dimensions & Utility | ||
| Length | 4600 mm | 5049 mm |
| Width | 1855 mm | 2004 mm |
| Height | 1685 mm | 1775 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2690 mm | 3025 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1660 kg | 1970 kg |
| Doors / Seats | 4 / 5 | 5 / 7 |
The top-ranking comparison pages win because they answer an explicit buying job: which one is more efficient, which one is safer, which one is larger, which one has the broader powertrain range. Pages that only dump two brochures side by side rarely hold clicks.
This comparison uses the newest verified generation of each model as the headline lens, then routes you into the exact generation sheets for the trim-level details. That is more durable than comparing incentives or dealer inventory, and more trustworthy than hiding missing data behind a made-up score.
Toyota RAV4 wins on verified EPA combined economy at up to 40 MPG, versus 25 MPG for the Ford Explorer.
Ford Explorer reaches the higher verified peak at 400 hp, compared with 302 hp for the Toyota RAV4.
Toyota RAV4 has a latest recorded NHTSA overall rating of 5★; Ford Explorer has not rated. Cross-check the frontal, side and rollover rows rather than using one headline number alone.
This page compares the newest verified generation of each model family. For year-specific engines, dimensions and trim tables, open the linked generation pages for each side.
Free vehicle research tools
Found this useful?
Mark Car Data Index as a preferred source and our data shows up first in your Google results.