If fuel cost matters most
Ford Explorer with up to 25 MPG combined.
12 makes · 51 models · 249 powertrains indexed
Data: NHTSA · EPA · Manufacturer records
100% free
Side-by-side verified model comparison
Toyota Land Cruiser and Ford Explorer answer the same shopping question from different directions. The Explorer is more efficient on verified EPA data, while the Land Cruiser reaches the higher power peak. Use the table below to decide whether your priority is fuel cost, safety, size or outright output.
| Metric | Toyota Land Cruiser | Ford Explorer |
|---|---|---|
| Production coverage | 1951 - present | 1990 - present |
| Verified generations | 2 | 2 |
| Peak power | 409 hp | 400 hp |
| Best EPA combined | 23 MPG | 25 MPG |
| Latest NHTSA overall | 4★ | NR |
| Open recalls (2021/2020) | 0 | 33 |
| Latest dimensions | 4950 × 1980 × 1925 mm | 5049 × 2004 × 1775 mm |
| Average curb weight | 2545 kg (5611 lbs) | 2117 kg (4667 lbs) |
| Fuel types | Diesel, Petrol | Petrol, Hybrid |
If fuel cost matters most
Ford Explorer with up to 25 MPG combined.
If power matters most
Toyota Land Cruiser with a verified peak of 409 hp.
If safety is the filter
The available data is incomplete, so use the side-by-side table rather than a one-line verdict.
A detailed side-by-side comparison of the entry-level powertrain for the newest verified generation of each model. This shows exactly what you get before adding options or stepping up to premium trims.
| Specification | Toyota Land CruiserLand Cruiser J300 3.3 V6 Twin-Turbo Diesel | Ford ExplorerExplorer VI (U625) 2.3L EcoBoost AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Engine & Performance | ||
| Engine Type | Diesel | Petrol |
| Cylinders / Configuration | V6 | I4 |
| Displacement | 3.3L (3346 cc) | 2.3L (2261 cc) |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Horsepower | 305 hp | 300 hp |
| Torque | 700 Nm | 420 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | 6.7 s | 6.0 s |
| Top Speed | 210 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Transmission & Drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | Automatic | 10-Speed Automatic |
| Gears | 10 | — |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Fuel Economy & Range | ||
| City MPG (EPA) | 20.0 MPG | 20.0 MPG |
| Highway MPG (EPA) | 26.0 MPG | 27.0 MPG |
| Combined MPG (EPA) | 23.0 MPG | 23.0 MPG |
| Electric Range | — | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | — |
| CO₂ Emissions | 268 g/km | — |
| Dimensions & Utility | ||
| Length | 4950 mm | 5049 mm |
| Width | 1980 mm | 2004 mm |
| Height | 1925 mm | 1775 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm | 3025 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2530 kg | 1970 kg |
| Doors / Seats | 4 / 7 | 5 / 7 |
The top-ranking comparison pages win because they answer an explicit buying job: which one is more efficient, which one is safer, which one is larger, which one has the broader powertrain range. Pages that only dump two brochures side by side rarely hold clicks.
This comparison uses the newest verified generation of each model as the headline lens, then routes you into the exact generation sheets for the trim-level details. That is more durable than comparing incentives or dealer inventory, and more trustworthy than hiding missing data behind a made-up score.
Ford Explorer wins on verified EPA combined economy at up to 25 MPG, versus 23 MPG for the Toyota Land Cruiser.
Toyota Land Cruiser reaches the higher verified peak at 409 hp, compared with 400 hp for the Ford Explorer.
Toyota Land Cruiser has a latest recorded NHTSA overall rating of 4★; Ford Explorer has not rated. Cross-check the frontal, side and rollover rows rather than using one headline number alone.
This page compares the newest verified generation of each model family. For year-specific engines, dimensions and trim tables, open the linked generation pages for each side.
Free vehicle research tools
Found this useful?
Mark Car Data Index as a preferred source and our data shows up first in your Google results.