If fuel cost matters most
Audi Q5 with up to 42 MPG combined.
12 makes · 51 models · 249 powertrains indexed
Data: NHTSA · EPA · Manufacturer records
100% free
Side-by-side verified model comparison
Toyota Land Cruiser and Audi Q5 answer the same shopping question from different directions. The Q5 is more efficient on verified EPA data, while the Land Cruiser reaches the higher power peak. Use the table below to decide whether your priority is fuel cost, safety, size or outright output.
| Metric | Toyota Land Cruiser | Audi Q5 |
|---|---|---|
| Production coverage | 1951 - present | 2008 - present |
| Verified generations | 2 | 2 |
| Peak power | 409 hp | 354 hp |
| Best EPA combined | 23 MPG | 42 MPG |
| Latest NHTSA overall | 4★ | 5★ |
| Open recalls (2021/2024) | 0 | 4 |
| Latest dimensions | 4950 × 1980 × 1925 mm | 4682 × 1893 × 1662 mm |
| Average curb weight | 2545 kg (5611 lbs) | 1827 kg (4028 lbs) |
| Fuel types | Diesel, Petrol | Diesel, Petrol |
If fuel cost matters most
Audi Q5 with up to 42 MPG combined.
If power matters most
Toyota Land Cruiser with a verified peak of 409 hp.
If safety is the filter
Audi Q5, based on the newest NHTSA overall star rating on file.
A detailed side-by-side comparison of the entry-level powertrain for the newest verified generation of each model. This shows exactly what you get before adding options or stepping up to premium trims.
| Specification | Toyota Land CruiserLand Cruiser J300 3.3 V6 Twin-Turbo Diesel | Audi Q5Q5 FY 40 TDI quattro |
|---|---|---|
| Engine & Performance | ||
| Engine Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders / Configuration | V6 | I4 |
| Displacement | 3.3L (3346 cc) | 2.0L (1968 cc) |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Horsepower | 305 hp | 204 hp |
| Torque | 700 Nm | 400 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | 6.7 s | 7.6 s |
| Top Speed | 210 km/h | 222 km/h |
| Transmission & Drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | Automatic | Dual-clutch |
| Gears | 10 | 7 |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Fuel Economy & Range | ||
| City MPG (EPA) | 20.0 MPG | 37.0 MPG |
| Highway MPG (EPA) | 26.0 MPG | 46.0 MPG |
| Combined MPG (EPA) | 23.0 MPG | 42.0 MPG |
| Electric Range | — | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | — |
| CO₂ Emissions | 268 g/km | 148 g/km |
| Dimensions & Utility | ||
| Length | 4950 mm | 4682 mm |
| Width | 1980 mm | 1893 mm |
| Height | 1925 mm | 1662 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm | 2832 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2530 kg | 1825 kg |
| Doors / Seats | 4 / 7 | 4 / 5 |
The top-ranking comparison pages win because they answer an explicit buying job: which one is more efficient, which one is safer, which one is larger, which one has the broader powertrain range. Pages that only dump two brochures side by side rarely hold clicks.
This comparison uses the newest verified generation of each model as the headline lens, then routes you into the exact generation sheets for the trim-level details. That is more durable than comparing incentives or dealer inventory, and more trustworthy than hiding missing data behind a made-up score.
Audi Q5 wins on verified EPA combined economy at up to 42 MPG, versus 23 MPG for the Toyota Land Cruiser.
Toyota Land Cruiser reaches the higher verified peak at 409 hp, compared with 354 hp for the Audi Q5.
Toyota Land Cruiser has a latest recorded NHTSA overall rating of 4★; Audi Q5 has 5★. Cross-check the frontal, side and rollover rows rather than using one headline number alone.
This page compares the newest verified generation of each model family. For year-specific engines, dimensions and trim tables, open the linked generation pages for each side.
Free vehicle research tools
Found this useful?
Mark Car Data Index as a preferred source and our data shows up first in your Google results.