If fuel cost matters most
Honda CR-V with up to 37 MPG combined.
Side-by-side verified model comparison
Toyota Highlander vs Honda CR-V
Toyota Highlander and Honda CR-V answer the same shopping question from different directions. The CR-V is more efficient on verified EPA data, while the Highlander reaches the higher power peak. Use the table below to decide whether your priority is fuel cost, safety, size or outright output.
At a glance
| Metric | Toyota Highlander | Honda CR-V |
|---|---|---|
| Production coverage | 2001 - present | 1995 - present |
| Verified generations | 2 | 2 |
| Peak power | 295 hp | 204 hp |
| Best EPA combined | 35 MPG | 37 MPG |
| Latest NHTSA overall | NR | 5★ |
| Open recalls (2020/2023) | 4 | 3 |
| Latest dimensions | 4950 × 1930 × 1730 mm | 4706 × 1866 × 1681 mm |
| Average curb weight | 1988 kg (4383 lbs) | 1725 kg (3803 lbs) |
| Fuel types | Hybrid, Petrol | Petrol, Hybrid |
If power matters most
Toyota Highlander with a verified peak of 295 hp.
If safety is the filter
The available data is incomplete, so use the side-by-side table rather than a one-line verdict.
Advertisement
Head-to-Head: Base Model Specifications
A detailed side-by-side comparison of the entry-level powertrain for the newest verified generation of each model. This shows exactly what you get before adding options or stepping up to premium trims.
| Specification | Toyota HighlanderHighlander IV (XU70) 2.5L Hybrid AWD | Honda CR-VCR-V VI 1.5 VTEC Turbo AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Engine & Performance | ||
| Engine Type | Hybrid | Petrol |
| Cylinders / Configuration | I4 | I4 |
| Displacement | 2.5L (2487 cc) | 1.5L (1498 cc) |
| Aspiration | Naturally aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Horsepower | 243 hp | 190 hp |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 243 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | 7.5 s | 8.6 s |
| Top Speed | 180 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Transmission & Drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | e-CVT | CVT |
| Gears | — | — |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| Fuel Economy & Range | ||
| City MPG (EPA) | 35.0 MPG | 27.0 MPG |
| Highway MPG (EPA) | 35.0 MPG | 32.0 MPG |
| Combined MPG (EPA) | 35.0 MPG | 29.0 MPG |
| Electric Range | — | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | — |
| CO₂ Emissions | — | 172 g/km |
| Dimensions & Utility | ||
| Length | 4950 mm | 4706 mm |
| Width | 1930 mm | 1866 mm |
| Height | 1730 mm | 1681 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2010 kg | 1685 kg |
| Doors / Seats | 5 / 8 | 4 / 5 |
What search winners do that generic comparisons don’t
The top-ranking comparison pages win because they answer an explicit buying job: which one is more efficient, which one is safer, which one is larger, which one has the broader powertrain range. Pages that only dump two brochures side by side rarely hold clicks.
This comparison uses the newest verified generation of each model as the headline lens, then routes you into the exact generation sheets for the trim-level details. That is more durable than comparing incentives or dealer inventory, and more trustworthy than hiding missing data behind a made-up score.
Questions buyers ask
Which is more fuel-efficient, the Highlander or the CR-V?
Honda CR-V wins on verified EPA combined economy at up to 37 MPG, versus 35 MPG for the Toyota Highlander.
Which has more horsepower, the Highlander or the CR-V?
Toyota Highlander reaches the higher verified peak at 295 hp, compared with 204 hp for the Honda CR-V.
Which is safer: Highlander or CR-V?
Toyota Highlander has a latest recorded NHTSA overall rating of not rated; Honda CR-V has 5★. Cross-check the frontal, side and rollover rows rather than using one headline number alone.
Is this a trim-by-trim comparison?
This page compares the newest verified generation of each model family. For year-specific engines, dimensions and trim tables, open the linked generation pages for each side.