If fuel cost matters most
Toyota Highlander with up to 35 MPG combined.
Side-by-side verified model comparison
Toyota Highlander vs Audi Q7
Toyota Highlander and Audi Q7 answer the same shopping question from different directions. The Highlander is more efficient on verified EPA data, while the Q7 reaches the higher power peak. Use the table below to decide whether your priority is fuel cost, safety, size or outright output.
At a glance
| Metric | Toyota Highlander | Audi Q7 |
|---|---|---|
| Production coverage | 2001 - present | 2005 - present |
| Verified generations | 2 | 2 |
| Peak power | 295 hp | 500 hp |
| Best EPA combined | 35 MPG | 28 MPG |
| Latest NHTSA overall | NR | NR |
| Open recalls (2020/2016) | 4 | 1 |
| Latest dimensions | 4950 × 1930 × 1730 mm | 5063 × 1970 × 1741 mm |
| Average curb weight | 1988 kg (4383 lbs) | 2226 kg (4907 lbs) |
| Fuel types | Hybrid, Petrol | Gasoline, Diesel, Mild Hybrid Gasoline |
If power matters most
Audi Q7 with a verified peak of 500 hp.
If safety is the filter
The available data is incomplete, so use the side-by-side table rather than a one-line verdict.
Advertisement
Head-to-Head: Base Model Specifications
A detailed side-by-side comparison of the entry-level powertrain for the newest verified generation of each model. This shows exactly what you get before adding options or stepping up to premium trims.
| Specification | Toyota HighlanderHighlander IV (XU70) 2.5L Hybrid AWD | Audi Q7Audi Q7 (Type 4M) 45 TFSI quattro |
|---|---|---|
| Engine & Performance | ||
| Engine Type | Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Cylinders / Configuration | I4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2.5L (2487 cc) | 2.0L (1984 cc) |
| Aspiration | Naturally aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Horsepower | 243 hp | 261 hp |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 370 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | 7.5 s | 6.9 s |
| Top Speed | 180 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Transmission & Drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | e-CVT | 8-Speed Tiptronic (ZF 8HP) |
| Gears | — | — |
| Drivetrain | AWD | quattro Pe |
| Fuel Economy & Range | ||
| City MPG (EPA) | 35.0 MPG | 19.0 MPG |
| Highway MPG (EPA) | 35.0 MPG | 25.0 MPG |
| Combined MPG (EPA) | 35.0 MPG | 21.0 MPG |
| Electric Range | — | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | — |
| CO₂ Emissions | — | — |
| Dimensions & Utility | ||
| Length | 4950 mm | 5063 mm |
| Width | 1930 mm | 1970 mm |
| Height | 1730 mm | 1741 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm | 2994 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2010 kg | 2165 kg |
| Doors / Seats | 5 / 8 | 5 / 7 |
What search winners do that generic comparisons don’t
The top-ranking comparison pages win because they answer an explicit buying job: which one is more efficient, which one is safer, which one is larger, which one has the broader powertrain range. Pages that only dump two brochures side by side rarely hold clicks.
This comparison uses the newest verified generation of each model as the headline lens, then routes you into the exact generation sheets for the trim-level details. That is more durable than comparing incentives or dealer inventory, and more trustworthy than hiding missing data behind a made-up score.
Questions buyers ask
Which is more fuel-efficient, the Highlander or the Q7?
Toyota Highlander wins on verified EPA combined economy at up to 35 MPG, versus 28 MPG for the Audi Q7.
Which has more horsepower, the Highlander or the Q7?
Audi Q7 reaches the higher verified peak at 500 hp, compared with 295 hp for the Toyota Highlander.
Is this a trim-by-trim comparison?
This page compares the newest verified generation of each model family. For year-specific engines, dimensions and trim tables, open the linked generation pages for each side.