If fuel cost matters most
Toyota Camry with up to 51 MPG combined.
12 makes · 49 models · 236 powertrains indexed
Data: NHTSA · EPA · Manufacturer records
100% free
Side-by-side verified model comparison
Toyota Camry and BMW 3 Series answer the same shopping question from different directions. The Camry is more efficient on verified EPA data, while the 3 Series reaches the higher power peak. Use the table below to decide whether your priority is fuel cost, safety, size or outright output.
| Metric | Toyota Camry | BMW 3 Series |
|---|---|---|
| Production coverage | 1982 - present | 1975 - present |
| Verified generations | 2 | 2 |
| Peak power | 232 hp | 382 hp |
| Best EPA combined | 51 MPG | 41 MPG |
| Latest NHTSA overall | 5★ | 5★ |
| Open recalls (2025/2019) | 0 | 0 |
| Latest dimensions | 4915 × 1840 × 1450 mm | 4709 × 1827 × 1435 mm |
| Average curb weight | 1612 kg (3554 lbs) | 1600 kg (3527 lbs) |
| Fuel types | Hybrid | Petrol |
If fuel cost matters most
Toyota Camry with up to 51 MPG combined.
If power matters most
BMW 3 Series with a verified peak of 382 hp.
If safety is the filter
They are effectively tied on this metric; use the table and generation links for context.
A detailed side-by-side comparison of the entry-level powertrain for the newest verified generation of each model. This shows exactly what you get before adding options or stepping up to premium trims.
| Specification | Toyota CamryCamry XV80 2.5 Hybrid FWD | BMW 3 Series3 Series G20 320i 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine & Performance | ||
| Engine Type | Hybrid | Petrol |
| Cylinders / Configuration | I4 + e-motor | I4 |
| Displacement | 2.5L (2487 cc) | 2.0L (1998 cc) |
| Aspiration | Naturally aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Horsepower | 225 hp | 184 hp |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 290 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | 7.5 s | 7.1 s |
| Top Speed | 180 km/h | 235 km/h |
| Transmission & Drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | eCVT | Automatic |
| Gears | — | 8 |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Fuel Economy & Range | ||
| City MPG (EPA) | 51.0 MPG | 35.0 MPG |
| Highway MPG (EPA) | 53.0 MPG | 47.0 MPG |
| Combined MPG (EPA) | 51.0 MPG | 41.0 MPG |
| Electric Range | — | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | — |
| CO₂ Emissions | 106 g/km | 139 g/km |
| Dimensions & Utility | ||
| Length | 4915 mm | 4709 mm |
| Width | 1840 mm | 1827 mm |
| Height | 1450 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2825 mm | 2851 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1570 kg | 1500 kg |
| Doors / Seats | 4 / 5 | 4 / 5 |
The top-ranking comparison pages win because they answer an explicit buying job: which one is more efficient, which one is safer, which one is larger, which one has the broader powertrain range. Pages that only dump two brochures side by side rarely hold clicks.
This comparison uses the newest verified generation of each model as the headline lens, then routes you into the exact generation sheets for the trim-level details. That is more durable than comparing incentives or dealer inventory, and more trustworthy than hiding missing data behind a made-up score.
Toyota Camry wins on verified EPA combined economy at up to 51 MPG, versus 41 MPG for the BMW 3 Series.
BMW 3 Series reaches the higher verified peak at 382 hp, compared with 232 hp for the Toyota Camry.
Toyota Camry has a latest recorded NHTSA overall rating of 5★; BMW 3 Series has 5★. Cross-check the frontal, side and rollover rows rather than using one headline number alone.
This page compares the newest verified generation of each model family. For year-specific engines, dimensions and trim tables, open the linked generation pages for each side.
Free vehicle research tools
Found this useful?
Mark Car Data Index as a preferred source and our data shows up first in your Google results.