If fuel cost matters most
BMW X5 with up to 25 MPG combined.
Side-by-side verified model comparison
Toyota 4Runner vs BMW X5
Toyota 4Runner and BMW X5 answer the same shopping question from different directions. The X5 is more efficient on verified EPA data, while the X5 reaches the higher power peak. Use the table below to decide whether your priority is fuel cost, safety, size or outright output.
At a glance
| Metric | Toyota 4Runner | BMW X5 |
|---|---|---|
| Production coverage | 1984 - present | 1999 - present |
| Verified generations | 2 | 2 |
| Peak power | 326 hp | 530 hp |
| Best EPA combined | 23 MPG | 25 MPG |
| Latest NHTSA overall | NR | 4★ |
| Open recalls (2025/2019) | 1 | 13 |
| Latest dimensions | 4950 × 1976 × 1798 mm | 4922 × 2004 × 1745 mm |
| Average curb weight | 2280 kg (5027 lbs) | 2277 kg (5020 lbs) |
| Fuel types | Gasoline, Hybrid Gasoline | Petrol, Plug-in Hybrid |
If power matters most
BMW X5 with a verified peak of 530 hp.
If safety is the filter
The available data is incomplete, so use the side-by-side table rather than a one-line verdict.
Advertisement
Head-to-Head: Base Model Specifications
A detailed side-by-side comparison of the entry-level powertrain for the newest verified generation of each model. This shows exactly what you get before adding options or stepping up to premium trims.
| Specification | Toyota 4RunnerToyota 4Runner (N380 6th Gen) i-FORCE 2.4L Turbo 4WD (SR5/TRD Off-Road) | BMW X5X5 G05 xDrive40i 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine & Performance | ||
| Engine Type | Gasoline | Petrol |
| Cylinders / Configuration | Inline-4 | I6 |
| Displacement | 2.4L (2393 cc) | 3.0L (2998 cc) |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Horsepower | 278 hp | 340 hp |
| Torque | 430 Nm | 450 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | 7.1 s | 5.5 s |
| Top Speed | 190 km/h | 245 km/h |
| Transmission & Drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | 8-Speed Electronically Controlled Automatic (Direct Shift-8A | Automatic |
| Gears | — | 8 |
| Drivetrain | Part-Time | AWD |
| Fuel Economy & Range | ||
| City MPG (EPA) | 20.0 MPG | 22.0 MPG |
| Highway MPG (EPA) | 24.0 MPG | 29.0 MPG |
| Combined MPG (EPA) | 22.0 MPG | 25.0 MPG |
| Electric Range | — | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | — |
| CO₂ Emissions | — | 201 g/km |
| Dimensions & Utility | ||
| Length | 4950 mm | 4922 mm |
| Width | 1976 mm | 2004 mm |
| Height | 1798 mm | 1745 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm | 2975 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2180 kg | 2110 kg |
| Doors / Seats | 5 / 5 | 4 / 7 |
What search winners do that generic comparisons don’t
The top-ranking comparison pages win because they answer an explicit buying job: which one is more efficient, which one is safer, which one is larger, which one has the broader powertrain range. Pages that only dump two brochures side by side rarely hold clicks.
This comparison uses the newest verified generation of each model as the headline lens, then routes you into the exact generation sheets for the trim-level details. That is more durable than comparing incentives or dealer inventory, and more trustworthy than hiding missing data behind a made-up score.
Questions buyers ask
Which is more fuel-efficient, the 4Runner or the X5?
BMW X5 wins on verified EPA combined economy at up to 25 MPG, versus 23 MPG for the Toyota 4Runner.
Which has more horsepower, the 4Runner or the X5?
BMW X5 reaches the higher verified peak at 530 hp, compared with 326 hp for the Toyota 4Runner.
Which is safer: 4Runner or X5?
Toyota 4Runner has a latest recorded NHTSA overall rating of not rated; BMW X5 has 4★. Cross-check the frontal, side and rollover rows rather than using one headline number alone.
Is this a trim-by-trim comparison?
This page compares the newest verified generation of each model family. For year-specific engines, dimensions and trim tables, open the linked generation pages for each side.