If fuel cost matters most
Honda CR-V with up to 37 MPG combined.
Side-by-side verified model comparison
Nissan Rogue vs Honda CR-V
Nissan Rogue and Honda CR-V answer the same shopping question from different directions. The CR-V is more efficient on verified EPA data, while the CR-V reaches the higher power peak. Use the table below to decide whether your priority is fuel cost, safety, size or outright output.
At a glance
| Metric | Nissan Rogue | Honda CR-V |
|---|---|---|
| Production coverage | 2007 - present | 1995 - present |
| Verified generations | 2 | 2 |
| Peak power | 201 hp | 204 hp |
| Best EPA combined | 30 MPG | 37 MPG |
| Latest NHTSA overall | 5★ | 5★ |
| Open recalls (2021/2023) | 10 | 3 |
| Latest dimensions | 4648 × 1839 × 1689 mm | 4706 × 1866 × 1681 mm |
| Average curb weight | 1620 kg (3571 lbs) | 1725 kg (3803 lbs) |
| Fuel types | Petrol | Petrol, Hybrid |
If power matters most
Honda CR-V with a verified peak of 204 hp.
If safety is the filter
They are effectively tied on this metric; use the table and generation links for context.
Advertisement
Head-to-Head: Base Model Specifications
A detailed side-by-side comparison of the entry-level powertrain for the newest verified generation of each model. This shows exactly what you get before adding options or stepping up to premium trims.
| Specification | Nissan RogueRogue III 2.5 | Honda CR-VCR-V VI 1.5 VTEC Turbo AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Engine & Performance | ||
| Engine Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Cylinders / Configuration | I4 | I4 |
| Displacement | 2.5L (2488 cc) | 1.5L (1498 cc) |
| Aspiration | Naturally aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Horsepower | 181 hp | 190 hp |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 243 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
| Top Speed | 190 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Transmission & Drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | CVT | CVT |
| Gears | — | — |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD |
| Fuel Economy & Range | ||
| City MPG (EPA) | 27.0 MPG | 27.0 MPG |
| Highway MPG (EPA) | 35.0 MPG | 32.0 MPG |
| Combined MPG (EPA) | 30.0 MPG | 29.0 MPG |
| Electric Range | — | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | — |
| CO₂ Emissions | 168 g/km | 172 g/km |
| Dimensions & Utility | ||
| Length | 4648 mm | 4706 mm |
| Width | 1839 mm | 1866 mm |
| Height | 1689 mm | 1681 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2705 mm | 2700 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1580 kg | 1685 kg |
| Doors / Seats | 4 / 5 | 4 / 5 |
What search winners do that generic comparisons don’t
The top-ranking comparison pages win because they answer an explicit buying job: which one is more efficient, which one is safer, which one is larger, which one has the broader powertrain range. Pages that only dump two brochures side by side rarely hold clicks.
This comparison uses the newest verified generation of each model as the headline lens, then routes you into the exact generation sheets for the trim-level details. That is more durable than comparing incentives or dealer inventory, and more trustworthy than hiding missing data behind a made-up score.
Questions buyers ask
Which is more fuel-efficient, the Rogue or the CR-V?
Honda CR-V wins on verified EPA combined economy at up to 37 MPG, versus 30 MPG for the Nissan Rogue.
Which has more horsepower, the Rogue or the CR-V?
Honda CR-V reaches the higher verified peak at 204 hp, compared with 201 hp for the Nissan Rogue.
Which is safer: Rogue or CR-V?
Nissan Rogue has a latest recorded NHTSA overall rating of 5★; Honda CR-V has 5★. Cross-check the frontal, side and rollover rows rather than using one headline number alone.
Is this a trim-by-trim comparison?
This page compares the newest verified generation of each model family. For year-specific engines, dimensions and trim tables, open the linked generation pages for each side.