If fuel cost matters most
Toyota Camry with up to 51 MPG combined.
12 makes · 51 models · 249 powertrains indexed
Data: NHTSA · EPA · Manufacturer records
100% free
Side-by-side verified model comparison
Nissan Altima and Toyota Camry answer the same shopping question from different directions. The Camry is more efficient on verified EPA data, while the Altima reaches the higher power peak. Use the table below to decide whether your priority is fuel cost, safety, size or outright output.
| Metric | Nissan Altima | Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|
| Production coverage | 1992 - present | 1982 - present |
| Verified generations | 2 | 2 |
| Peak power | 248 hp | 232 hp |
| Best EPA combined | 32 MPG | 51 MPG |
| Latest NHTSA overall | 5★ | 5★ |
| Open recalls (2019/2025) | 7 | 0 |
| Latest dimensions | 4901 × 1850 × 1449 mm | 4915 × 1840 × 1450 mm |
| Average curb weight | 1500 kg (3307 lbs) | 1612 kg (3554 lbs) |
| Fuel types | Petrol | Hybrid |
If fuel cost matters most
Toyota Camry with up to 51 MPG combined.
If power matters most
Nissan Altima with a verified peak of 248 hp.
If safety is the filter
They are effectively tied on this metric; use the table and generation links for context.
A detailed side-by-side comparison of the entry-level powertrain for the newest verified generation of each model. This shows exactly what you get before adding options or stepping up to premium trims.
| Specification | Nissan AltimaAltima VI 2.5 | Toyota CamryCamry XV80 2.5 Hybrid FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Engine & Performance | ||
| Engine Type | Petrol | Hybrid |
| Cylinders / Configuration | I4 | I4 + e-motor |
| Displacement | 2.5L (2488 cc) | 2.5L (2487 cc) |
| Aspiration | Naturally aspirated | Naturally aspirated |
| Horsepower | 188 hp | 225 hp |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 221 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | 7.9 s | 7.5 s |
| Top Speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Transmission & Drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | CVT | eCVT |
| Gears | — | — |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Fuel Economy & Range | ||
| City MPG (EPA) | 28.0 MPG | 51.0 MPG |
| Highway MPG (EPA) | 39.0 MPG | 53.0 MPG |
| Combined MPG (EPA) | 32.0 MPG | 51.0 MPG |
| Electric Range | — | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | — |
| CO₂ Emissions | 150 g/km | 106 g/km |
| Dimensions & Utility | ||
| Length | 4901 mm | 4915 mm |
| Width | 1850 mm | 1840 mm |
| Height | 1449 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2825 mm | 2825 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1455 kg | 1570 kg |
| Doors / Seats | 4 / 5 | 4 / 5 |
The top-ranking comparison pages win because they answer an explicit buying job: which one is more efficient, which one is safer, which one is larger, which one has the broader powertrain range. Pages that only dump two brochures side by side rarely hold clicks.
This comparison uses the newest verified generation of each model as the headline lens, then routes you into the exact generation sheets for the trim-level details. That is more durable than comparing incentives or dealer inventory, and more trustworthy than hiding missing data behind a made-up score.
Toyota Camry wins on verified EPA combined economy at up to 51 MPG, versus 32 MPG for the Nissan Altima.
Nissan Altima reaches the higher verified peak at 248 hp, compared with 232 hp for the Toyota Camry.
Nissan Altima has a latest recorded NHTSA overall rating of 5★; Toyota Camry has 5★. Cross-check the frontal, side and rollover rows rather than using one headline number alone.
This page compares the newest verified generation of each model family. For year-specific engines, dimensions and trim tables, open the linked generation pages for each side.
Free vehicle research tools
Found this useful?
Mark Car Data Index as a preferred source and our data shows up first in your Google results.