If fuel cost matters most
Volkswagen Golf with up to 54 MPG combined.
12 makes · 51 models · 249 powertrains indexed
Data: NHTSA · EPA · Manufacturer records
100% free
Side-by-side verified model comparison
Mazda Mazda3 and Volkswagen Golf answer the same shopping question from different directions. The Golf is more efficient on verified EPA data, while the Golf reaches the higher power peak. Use the table below to decide whether your priority is fuel cost, safety, size or outright output.
| Metric | Mazda Mazda3 | Volkswagen Golf |
|---|---|---|
| Production coverage | 2003 - present | 1974 - present |
| Verified generations | 2 | 2 |
| Peak power | 250 hp | 320 hp |
| Best EPA combined | 38 MPG | 54 MPG |
| Latest NHTSA overall | 5★ | 5★ |
| Open recalls (2019/2020) | 6 | 2 |
| Latest dimensions | 4460 × 1795 × 1435 mm | 4284 × 1789 × 1456 mm |
| Average curb weight | 1447 kg (3190 lbs) | 1452 kg (3201 lbs) |
| Fuel types | Petrol | Petrol, Diesel |
If fuel cost matters most
Volkswagen Golf with up to 54 MPG combined.
If power matters most
Volkswagen Golf with a verified peak of 320 hp.
If safety is the filter
They are effectively tied on this metric; use the table and generation links for context.
A detailed side-by-side comparison of the entry-level powertrain for the newest verified generation of each model. This shows exactly what you get before adding options or stepping up to premium trims.
| Specification | Mazda Mazda3Mazda3 IV 2.0 SKYACTIV-G | Volkswagen GolfGolf Mk8 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Engine & Performance | ||
| Engine Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Cylinders / Configuration | I4 | I4 |
| Displacement | 2.0L (1998 cc) | 1.5L (1498 cc) |
| Aspiration | Naturally aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Horsepower | 122 hp | 150 hp |
| Torque | 213 Nm | 250 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | 10.4 s | 8.5 s |
| Top Speed | 197 km/h | 224 km/h |
| Transmission & Drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | Automatic | Dual-clutch |
| Gears | 6 | 7 |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Fuel Economy & Range | ||
| City MPG (EPA) | 32.0 MPG | 38.0 MPG |
| Highway MPG (EPA) | 44.0 MPG | 52.0 MPG |
| Combined MPG (EPA) | 38.0 MPG | 45.0 MPG |
| Electric Range | — | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | — |
| CO₂ Emissions | 132 g/km | 127 g/km |
| Dimensions & Utility | ||
| Length | 4460 mm | 4284 mm |
| Width | 1795 mm | 1789 mm |
| Height | 1435 mm | 1456 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2725 mm | 2636 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1370 kg | 1357 kg |
| Doors / Seats | 4 / 5 | 4 / 5 |
The top-ranking comparison pages win because they answer an explicit buying job: which one is more efficient, which one is safer, which one is larger, which one has the broader powertrain range. Pages that only dump two brochures side by side rarely hold clicks.
This comparison uses the newest verified generation of each model as the headline lens, then routes you into the exact generation sheets for the trim-level details. That is more durable than comparing incentives or dealer inventory, and more trustworthy than hiding missing data behind a made-up score.
Volkswagen Golf wins on verified EPA combined economy at up to 54 MPG, versus 38 MPG for the Mazda Mazda3.
Volkswagen Golf reaches the higher verified peak at 320 hp, compared with 250 hp for the Mazda Mazda3.
Mazda Mazda3 has a latest recorded NHTSA overall rating of 5★; Volkswagen Golf has 5★. Cross-check the frontal, side and rollover rows rather than using one headline number alone.
This page compares the newest verified generation of each model family. For year-specific engines, dimensions and trim tables, open the linked generation pages for each side.
Free vehicle research tools
Found this useful?
Mark Car Data Index as a preferred source and our data shows up first in your Google results.