If fuel cost matters most
Ford Focus with up to 46 MPG combined.
12 makes · 51 models · 249 powertrains indexed
Data: NHTSA · EPA · Manufacturer records
100% free
Side-by-side verified model comparison
Ford Focus and Mazda Mazda3 answer the same shopping question from different directions. The Focus is more efficient on verified EPA data, while the Focus reaches the higher power peak. Use the table below to decide whether your priority is fuel cost, safety, size or outright output.
| Metric | Ford Focus | Mazda Mazda3 |
|---|---|---|
| Production coverage | 1998 - present | 2003 - present |
| Verified generations | 2 | 2 |
| Peak power | 280 hp | 250 hp |
| Best EPA combined | 46 MPG | 38 MPG |
| Latest NHTSA overall | NR | 5★ |
| Open recalls (2022/2019) | 0 | 6 |
| Latest dimensions | 4378 × 1825 × 1471 mm | 4460 × 1795 × 1435 mm |
| Average curb weight | 1379 kg (3040 lbs) | 1447 kg (3190 lbs) |
| Fuel types | Petrol | Petrol |
If fuel cost matters most
Ford Focus with up to 46 MPG combined.
If power matters most
Ford Focus with a verified peak of 280 hp.
If safety is the filter
The available data is incomplete, so use the side-by-side table rather than a one-line verdict.
A detailed side-by-side comparison of the entry-level powertrain for the newest verified generation of each model. This shows exactly what you get before adding options or stepping up to premium trims.
| Specification | Ford FocusFocus IV 1.0 EcoBoost 125 | Mazda Mazda3Mazda3 IV 2.0 SKYACTIV-G |
|---|---|---|
| Engine & Performance | ||
| Engine Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Cylinders / Configuration | I3 | I4 |
| Displacement | 1.0L (999 cc) | 2.0L (1998 cc) |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally aspirated |
| Horsepower | 125 hp | 122 hp |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 213 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
| Top Speed | 187 km/h | 197 km/h |
| Transmission & Drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | Manual | Automatic |
| Gears | 6 | 6 |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Fuel Economy & Range | ||
| City MPG (EPA) | 40.0 MPG | 32.0 MPG |
| Highway MPG (EPA) | 53.0 MPG | 44.0 MPG |
| Combined MPG (EPA) | 46.0 MPG | 38.0 MPG |
| Electric Range | — | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | — |
| CO₂ Emissions | 116 g/km | 132 g/km |
| Dimensions & Utility | ||
| Length | 4378 mm | 4460 mm |
| Width | 1825 mm | 1795 mm |
| Height | 1471 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2700 mm | 2725 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1310 kg | 1370 kg |
| Doors / Seats | 5 / 5 | 4 / 5 |
The top-ranking comparison pages win because they answer an explicit buying job: which one is more efficient, which one is safer, which one is larger, which one has the broader powertrain range. Pages that only dump two brochures side by side rarely hold clicks.
This comparison uses the newest verified generation of each model as the headline lens, then routes you into the exact generation sheets for the trim-level details. That is more durable than comparing incentives or dealer inventory, and more trustworthy than hiding missing data behind a made-up score.
Ford Focus wins on verified EPA combined economy at up to 46 MPG, versus 38 MPG for the Mazda Mazda3.
Ford Focus reaches the higher verified peak at 280 hp, compared with 250 hp for the Mazda Mazda3.
Ford Focus has a latest recorded NHTSA overall rating of not rated; Mazda Mazda3 has 5★. Cross-check the frontal, side and rollover rows rather than using one headline number alone.
This page compares the newest verified generation of each model family. For year-specific engines, dimensions and trim tables, open the linked generation pages for each side.
Free vehicle research tools
Found this useful?
Mark Car Data Index as a preferred source and our data shows up first in your Google results.