If fuel cost matters most
Hyundai Kona with up to 116 MPG combined.
Side-by-side verified model comparison
Ford Explorer vs Hyundai Kona
Ford Explorer and Hyundai Kona answer the same shopping question from different directions. The Kona is more efficient on verified EPA data, while the Explorer reaches the higher power peak. Use the table below to decide whether your priority is fuel cost, safety, size or outright output.
At a glance
| Metric | Ford Explorer | Hyundai Kona |
|---|---|---|
| Production coverage | 1990 - present | 2017 - present |
| Verified generations | 2 | 2 |
| Peak power | 400 hp | 201 hp |
| Best EPA combined | 25 MPG | 116 MPG |
| Latest NHTSA overall | NR | NR |
| Open recalls (2020/2024) | 33 | 4 |
| Latest dimensions | 5049 × 2004 × 1775 mm | 4350 × 1825 × 1575 mm |
| Average curb weight | 2117 kg (4667 lbs) | 1533 kg (3380 lbs) |
| Fuel types | Petrol, Hybrid | Petrol, Electric |
If power matters most
Ford Explorer with a verified peak of 400 hp.
If safety is the filter
The available data is incomplete, so use the side-by-side table rather than a one-line verdict.
Advertisement
Head-to-Head: Base Model Specifications
A detailed side-by-side comparison of the entry-level powertrain for the newest verified generation of each model. This shows exactly what you get before adding options or stepping up to premium trims.
| Specification | Ford ExplorerExplorer VI (U625) 2.3L EcoBoost AWD | Hyundai Kona2nd Generation (SX2) 2.0L Smartstream FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Engine & Performance | ||
| Engine Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Cylinders / Configuration | I4 | I4 |
| Displacement | 2.3L (2261 cc) | 2.0L (1999 cc) |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally aspirated |
| Horsepower | 300 hp | 147 hp |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 179 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | 6.0 s | — |
| Top Speed | 200 km/h | — |
| Transmission & Drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | 10-Speed Automatic | Smartstream IVT |
| Gears | — | — |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD |
| Fuel Economy & Range | ||
| City MPG (EPA) | 20.0 MPG | 29.0 MPG |
| Highway MPG (EPA) | 27.0 MPG | 34.0 MPG |
| Combined MPG (EPA) | 23.0 MPG | 31.0 MPG |
| Electric Range | — | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | — |
| CO₂ Emissions | — | — |
| Dimensions & Utility | ||
| Length | 5049 mm | 4350 mm |
| Width | 2004 mm | 1825 mm |
| Height | 1775 mm | 1575 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3025 mm | 2660 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1970 kg | 1360 kg |
| Doors / Seats | 5 / 7 | 5 / 5 |
What search winners do that generic comparisons don’t
The top-ranking comparison pages win because they answer an explicit buying job: which one is more efficient, which one is safer, which one is larger, which one has the broader powertrain range. Pages that only dump two brochures side by side rarely hold clicks.
This comparison uses the newest verified generation of each model as the headline lens, then routes you into the exact generation sheets for the trim-level details. That is more durable than comparing incentives or dealer inventory, and more trustworthy than hiding missing data behind a made-up score.
Questions buyers ask
Which is more fuel-efficient, the Explorer or the Kona?
Hyundai Kona wins on verified EPA combined economy at up to 116 MPG, versus 25 MPG for the Ford Explorer.
Which has more horsepower, the Explorer or the Kona?
Ford Explorer reaches the higher verified peak at 400 hp, compared with 201 hp for the Hyundai Kona.
Is this a trim-by-trim comparison?
This page compares the newest verified generation of each model family. For year-specific engines, dimensions and trim tables, open the linked generation pages for each side.