If fuel cost matters most
BMW X3 with up to 25 MPG combined.
Side-by-side verified model comparison
BMW X3 vs Honda Pilot
BMW X3 and Honda Pilot answer the same shopping question from different directions. The X3 is more efficient on verified EPA data, while the X3 reaches the higher power peak. Use the table below to decide whether your priority is fuel cost, safety, size or outright output.
At a glance
| Metric | BMW X3 | Honda Pilot |
|---|---|---|
| Production coverage | 2003 - present | 2002 - present |
| Verified generations | 2 | 2 |
| Peak power | 382 hp | 285 hp |
| Best EPA combined | 25 MPG | 21 MPG |
| Latest NHTSA overall | NR | NR |
| Open recalls (2024/2023) | 3 | 5 |
| Latest dimensions | 4708 × 1891 × 1676 mm | 5077 × 1994 × 1801 mm |
| Average curb weight | 1958 kg (4317 lbs) | 2085 kg (4597 lbs) |
| Fuel types | Petrol, Plug-in Hybrid | Petrol |
If power matters most
BMW X3 with a verified peak of 382 hp.
If safety is the filter
The available data is incomplete, so use the side-by-side table rather than a one-line verdict.
Advertisement
Head-to-Head: Base Model Specifications
A detailed side-by-side comparison of the entry-level powertrain for the newest verified generation of each model. This shows exactly what you get before adding options or stepping up to premium trims.
| Specification | BMW X3X3 III (G01) xDrive30i 2.0L Turbo | Honda PilotPilot IV (YG) 3.5L V6 AWD (i-VTM4) |
|---|---|---|
| Engine & Performance | ||
| Engine Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Cylinders / Configuration | I4 | V6 |
| Displacement | 2.0L (1998 cc) | 3.5L (3471 cc) |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally aspirated |
| Horsepower | 248 hp | 285 hp |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 355 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | 6.0 s | 6.5 s |
| Top Speed | 210 km/h | 185 km/h |
| Transmission & Drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | 8-Speed Steptronic Automatic | 10-Speed Automatic |
| Gears | — | — |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| Fuel Economy & Range | ||
| City MPG (EPA) | 21.0 MPG | 19.0 MPG |
| Highway MPG (EPA) | 28.0 MPG | 25.0 MPG |
| Combined MPG (EPA) | 24.0 MPG | 21.0 MPG |
| Electric Range | — | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | — |
| CO₂ Emissions | — | — |
| Dimensions & Utility | ||
| Length | 4708 mm | 5077 mm |
| Width | 1891 mm | 1994 mm |
| Height | 1676 mm | 1801 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2864 mm | 2890 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1860 kg | 2050 kg |
| Doors / Seats | 5 / 5 | 5 / 8 |
What search winners do that generic comparisons don’t
The top-ranking comparison pages win because they answer an explicit buying job: which one is more efficient, which one is safer, which one is larger, which one has the broader powertrain range. Pages that only dump two brochures side by side rarely hold clicks.
This comparison uses the newest verified generation of each model as the headline lens, then routes you into the exact generation sheets for the trim-level details. That is more durable than comparing incentives or dealer inventory, and more trustworthy than hiding missing data behind a made-up score.
Questions buyers ask
Which is more fuel-efficient, the X3 or the Pilot?
BMW X3 wins on verified EPA combined economy at up to 25 MPG, versus 21 MPG for the Honda Pilot.
Which has more horsepower, the X3 or the Pilot?
BMW X3 reaches the higher verified peak at 382 hp, compared with 285 hp for the Honda Pilot.
Is this a trim-by-trim comparison?
This page compares the newest verified generation of each model family. For year-specific engines, dimensions and trim tables, open the linked generation pages for each side.