If fuel cost matters most
Hyundai Kona with up to 116 MPG combined.
12 makes · 49 models · 236 powertrains indexed
Data: NHTSA · EPA · Manufacturer records
100% free
Side-by-side verified model comparison
Audi Q5 and Hyundai Kona answer the same shopping question from different directions. The Kona is more efficient on verified EPA data, while the Q5 reaches the higher power peak. Use the table below to decide whether your priority is fuel cost, safety, size or outright output.
| Metric | Audi Q5 | Hyundai Kona |
|---|---|---|
| Production coverage | 2008 - present | 2017 - present |
| Verified generations | 2 | 2 |
| Peak power | 354 hp | 201 hp |
| Best EPA combined | 42 MPG | 116 MPG |
| Latest NHTSA overall | 5★ | NR |
| Open recalls (2024/2024) | 4 | 4 |
| Latest dimensions | 4682 × 1893 × 1662 mm | 4350 × 1825 × 1575 mm |
| Average curb weight | 1827 kg (4028 lbs) | 1533 kg (3380 lbs) |
| Fuel types | Diesel, Petrol | Petrol, Electric |
If fuel cost matters most
Hyundai Kona with up to 116 MPG combined.
If power matters most
Audi Q5 with a verified peak of 354 hp.
If safety is the filter
The available data is incomplete, so use the side-by-side table rather than a one-line verdict.
A detailed side-by-side comparison of the entry-level powertrain for the newest verified generation of each model. This shows exactly what you get before adding options or stepping up to premium trims.
| Specification | Audi Q5Q5 FY 40 TDI quattro | Hyundai Kona2nd Generation (SX2) 2.0L Smartstream FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Engine & Performance | ||
| Engine Type | Diesel | Petrol |
| Cylinders / Configuration | I4 | I4 |
| Displacement | 2.0L (1968 cc) | 2.0L (1999 cc) |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally aspirated |
| Horsepower | 204 hp | 147 hp |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 179 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | 7.6 s | — |
| Top Speed | 222 km/h | — |
| Transmission & Drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | Dual-clutch | Smartstream IVT |
| Gears | 7 | — |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD |
| Fuel Economy & Range | ||
| City MPG (EPA) | 37.0 MPG | 29.0 MPG |
| Highway MPG (EPA) | 46.0 MPG | 34.0 MPG |
| Combined MPG (EPA) | 42.0 MPG | 31.0 MPG |
| Electric Range | — | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | — |
| CO₂ Emissions | 148 g/km | — |
| Dimensions & Utility | ||
| Length | 4682 mm | 4350 mm |
| Width | 1893 mm | 1825 mm |
| Height | 1662 mm | 1575 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2832 mm | 2660 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1825 kg | 1360 kg |
| Doors / Seats | 4 / 5 | 5 / 5 |
The top-ranking comparison pages win because they answer an explicit buying job: which one is more efficient, which one is safer, which one is larger, which one has the broader powertrain range. Pages that only dump two brochures side by side rarely hold clicks.
This comparison uses the newest verified generation of each model as the headline lens, then routes you into the exact generation sheets for the trim-level details. That is more durable than comparing incentives or dealer inventory, and more trustworthy than hiding missing data behind a made-up score.
Hyundai Kona wins on verified EPA combined economy at up to 116 MPG, versus 42 MPG for the Audi Q5.
Audi Q5 reaches the higher verified peak at 354 hp, compared with 201 hp for the Hyundai Kona.
Audi Q5 has a latest recorded NHTSA overall rating of 5★; Hyundai Kona has not rated. Cross-check the frontal, side and rollover rows rather than using one headline number alone.
This page compares the newest verified generation of each model family. For year-specific engines, dimensions and trim tables, open the linked generation pages for each side.
Free vehicle research tools
Found this useful?
Mark Car Data Index as a preferred source and our data shows up first in your Google results.