If fuel cost matters most
BMW 3 Series with up to 41 MPG combined.
12 makes · 49 models · 236 powertrains indexed
Data: NHTSA · EPA · Manufacturer records
100% free
Side-by-side verified model comparison
Audi A4 and BMW 3 Series answer the same shopping question from different directions. The 3 Series is more efficient on verified EPA data, while the 3 Series reaches the higher power peak. Use the table below to decide whether your priority is fuel cost, safety, size or outright output.
| Metric | Audi A4 | BMW 3 Series |
|---|---|---|
| Production coverage | 1994 - present | 1975 - present |
| Verified generations | 2 | 2 |
| Peak power | 354 hp | 382 hp |
| Best EPA combined | 37 MPG | 41 MPG |
| Latest NHTSA overall | 5★ | 5★ |
| Open recalls (2024/2019) | 0 | 0 |
| Latest dimensions | 4726 × 1842 × 1427 mm | 4709 × 1827 × 1435 mm |
| Average curb weight | 1605 kg (3538 lbs) | 1600 kg (3527 lbs) |
| Fuel types | Petrol | Petrol |
If fuel cost matters most
BMW 3 Series with up to 41 MPG combined.
If power matters most
BMW 3 Series with a verified peak of 382 hp.
If safety is the filter
They are effectively tied on this metric; use the table and generation links for context.
A detailed side-by-side comparison of the entry-level powertrain for the newest verified generation of each model. This shows exactly what you get before adding options or stepping up to premium trims.
| Specification | Audi A4A4 B9 40 TFSI 2.0 | BMW 3 Series3 Series G20 320i 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine & Performance | ||
| Engine Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Cylinders / Configuration | I4 | I4 |
| Displacement | 2.0L (1984 cc) | 2.0L (1998 cc) |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Horsepower | 190 hp | 184 hp |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 290 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | 7.3 s | 7.1 s |
| Top Speed | 210 km/h | 235 km/h |
| Transmission & Drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | Dual-clutch | Automatic |
| Gears | 7 | 8 |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Fuel Economy & Range | ||
| City MPG (EPA) | 32.0 MPG | 35.0 MPG |
| Highway MPG (EPA) | 43.0 MPG | 47.0 MPG |
| Combined MPG (EPA) | 37.0 MPG | 41.0 MPG |
| Electric Range | — | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | — |
| CO₂ Emissions | 139 g/km | 139 g/km |
| Dimensions & Utility | ||
| Length | 4726 mm | 4709 mm |
| Width | 1842 mm | 1827 mm |
| Height | 1427 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2820 mm | 2851 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1490 kg | 1500 kg |
| Doors / Seats | 4 / 5 | 4 / 5 |
The top-ranking comparison pages win because they answer an explicit buying job: which one is more efficient, which one is safer, which one is larger, which one has the broader powertrain range. Pages that only dump two brochures side by side rarely hold clicks.
This comparison uses the newest verified generation of each model as the headline lens, then routes you into the exact generation sheets for the trim-level details. That is more durable than comparing incentives or dealer inventory, and more trustworthy than hiding missing data behind a made-up score.
BMW 3 Series wins on verified EPA combined economy at up to 41 MPG, versus 37 MPG for the Audi A4.
BMW 3 Series reaches the higher verified peak at 382 hp, compared with 354 hp for the Audi A4.
Audi A4 has a latest recorded NHTSA overall rating of 5★; BMW 3 Series has 5★. Cross-check the frontal, side and rollover rows rather than using one headline number alone.
This page compares the newest verified generation of each model family. For year-specific engines, dimensions and trim tables, open the linked generation pages for each side.
Free vehicle research tools
Found this useful?
Mark Car Data Index as a preferred source and our data shows up first in your Google results.